<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.3 20210610//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1-3.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.3" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xml:lang="ru"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">edpolicy</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="ru">Образовательная политика</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>Educational Policy</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="ppub">2078-838X</issn><issn pub-type="epub">2949-0987</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Российская академия народного хозяйства и государственной службы при Президенте Российской Федерации (РАНХиГС</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id custom-type="elpub" pub-id-type="custom">edpolicy-293</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Research Article</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>ВИД СВЕРХУ. ИНЫЕ МИРЫ</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>TOP VIEW. OTHER WORLDS</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>ХРУПКИЙ МИР Через оптики простоты и сложности (ч. 1)</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>A fragile world in the optics of simplicity and complexity</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>ИВАХНЕНКО</surname><given-names>Евгений Николаевич</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>IVAKHNENKO</surname><given-names>Eugene N.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>д. филос. н., заместитель директора Школы антропологии будущего, профессор </p></bio><bio xml:lang="en"><p>Dr. Sci. (Philosophy), Deputy Director of the School of Anthropology of the Future, Prof</p></bio><email xlink:type="simple">ivahnen@rambler.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff-1"><aff xml:lang="ru"><institution>РАНХиГС&#13;
МГУ им. М. В. Ломоносова</institution><country>Россия</country></aff><aff xml:lang="en"><institution>RANEPA&#13;
Lomonosov Moscow State&#13;
University</institution><country>Russian Federation</country></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date pub-type="collection"><year>2020</year></pub-date><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>18</day><month>09</month><year>2026</year></pub-date><volume>0</volume><issue>3 (83)</issue><fpage>10</fpage><lpage>19</lpage><permissions><copyright-statement>Copyright &amp;#x00A9; ИВАХНЕНКО Е.Н., 2026</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2026</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">ИВАХНЕНКО Е.Н.</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">IVAKHNENKO E.N.</copyright-holder><license xml:lang="ru" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.</license-p></license><license xml:lang="en" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.</license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://edpolicy.ranepa.ru/jour/article/view/293">https://edpolicy.ranepa.ru/jour/article/view/293</self-uri><abstract><p>Почему мы называем мир хрупким? Почему научные открытия и стремительное развитие технологий вовсе не избавили нас от «черных лебедей»? То, что происходило с нами весной 2020-го, напоминает покушение на наши представления об устойчивости, надежности и предсказуемости мира, в котором мы живем. Все, что было призвано гарантировать устойчивое развитие — общественные институты, экономика, образование, наука, медицина,— демонстрирует бессилие или, хуже того, превращается в разновидность угрозы.Сегодня мало кто сомневается в том, что нам и нашим потомкам предстоит жить во все более усложняющемся и все менее предсказуемом мире. В настоящей статье предлагается бросить взгляд на ситуацию роста неопределенностей с двух «пригорков» — классической простоты и неклассической сложностности. Автор делает выбор в пользу «расставания с простотой». Но что это означает? Мы должны повернуться лицом к тем способам осмысления феноменов хрупкости и неопределенности, которые с разных сторон отстраивали интеллектуалы на рубеже ХХ и XXI века.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="en"><p>Why do we call the world fragile? How did it turn out that scientific discoveries and the rapid development of technology did not at all rid us of the «black swans»? What happened to us in these spring months of 2020 clearly encroaches on our ideas about the stability, reliability and predictability of the world in which we live. Everything that was designed to guarantee sustainable development — public institutions, economics, education, science,medicine — at some point demonstrate powerlessness or, even worse, turn into a kind of threat.Today, few people doubt that our and future generations will have to live in an increasingly complex and increasingly unpredictable world. This article proposes to cast a glance at the situation of growth of uncertainties from two «hills’ — classical simplicity and non-classical complexity (complicacy). The authormakes a choice in favor of «parting with simplicity». But what does this mean? — We must turn our face to those ways of understanding the phenomena of fragility and uncertainty, which were rebuilt by intellectuals from different angles at the turn of the century, leaving the twentieth and coming into its own on thetwenty-first</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>Сложностность</kwd><kwd>запутанность</kwd><kwd>аутопойезис</kwd><kwd>парадигма</kwd><kwd>эпистема</kwd><kwd>кризис</kwd><kwd>генеративность</kwd><kwd>университет</kwd><kwd>трансдисциплинарность</kwd><kwd>преадаптация.</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>complexity</kwd><kwd>entanglement</kwd><kwd>autopoiesis</kwd><kwd>paradigm</kwd><kwd>episteme</kwd><kwd>crisis</kwd><kwd>generativity</kwd><kwd>university</kwd><kwd>transdisciplinarity</kwd><kwd>preadaptation</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="cit1"><label>1</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Аршинов В. И., Свирский Я. И. Кое-что о сложностности. Послесловие</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Аrshinov, V. I. (2011). Synergetics meets complexity. Synergetics of innovative</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit2"><label>2</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">переводчика и редактора // Морен Э. О СЛОЖНОСТНОСТИ / Институт</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">complexity (pp. 47–65). Мoscow. (In Russian).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit3"><label>3</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">общегуманитарных исследований. М., 2019. С. 260–282.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Аrshinov, V. I., &amp; Budanov, V. G. (2016). Paradigm of Complexity and Socio-Humanitarian Projections of Convergent Technologies. Voprisy Filosofii, 1,</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit4"><label>4</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Аршинов В. И., Буданов В. Г. Парадигма сложностности и социогуманитарные проекции конвергентных технологий // Вопросы философии. 2016. № 1. С. 59–70.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">pp. 59–70. (In Russian).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit5"><label>5</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Аршинов В. И. Синергетика встречается со сложностью // Синергетическая парадигма. «Синергетика инновационной сложности». М.: Прогресс-Традиция. 2011. С. 47–65.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Аrshinov, V. I., &amp; Svirskiy, Ya. I. (2019). Something about the complexity. The</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit6"><label>6</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Бейтсон Г. Избыточность и кодирование // Шаги в направлении экологии разума: избранные статьи по теории эволюции и эпистемологии. М.: КомКнига, 2005. 232 с.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">translator’s and the editor’s epilog. About the complexity (pp. 60–282).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit7"><label>7</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Берлин И. Два понимания свободы // Берлин И. Философия свободы.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Мoscow. (In Russian).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit8"><label>8</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Европа. М.: Новое литературное обозрение, 2001. С. 122–185.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Bateson, G. (2005). Redunancy and Coding. Steps to an Ecology of Mind:</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit9"><label>9</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Буданов В., Аршинов В., Лепский В., Свирский Я. Сложностность и проблема единства знания. Выпуск 1. К стратегиям познания сложности. М.: ИФ РАН, 2018. 105 с.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Collected Essays in Anthropology, Psychiatry, Evolution, and Epistemology.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit10"><label>10</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Декарт Р. О страстях души // Декарт Р. Соч.: В 2 тт. Т. 1. М., 1989. С. 481–572.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Мoscow: КоmКniga. (In Russian).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit11"><label>11</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Декарт Р. Рассуждение о методе, чтобы верно направлять свой</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Berlin, I. (2001). Two Concepts of Liberty. In I. Berlin (Ed.). Philosophy of Liberty. Europe (pp. 122–185). Мoscow. (In Russian).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit12"><label>12</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">разум и отыскивать истину в науках // Декарт Р. Соч.: В 2 тт. Т. 1. М., 1989. С. 153.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Budanov, V., Arshinov, V., Lepskiy, V., &amp; Svirskiy, Ya. (2018). Complexity of the</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit13"><label>13</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Ивахненко Е. Н. Социология встречается со сложностью // Вестник РГГУ.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">problem of integrity of knowledge. To strategies of cognition of complexity (No. 1). Moscow: The Institute of Philosophy of Russian Academy</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit14"><label>14</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Серия «Философские науки. Религиоведение». № 11. 2013. С. 90–101.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">of Sciences. (In Russian).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit15"><label>15</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Кларк Б. Поддержание изменений в университетах. Преемственность</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Burton, C. (2011). Sustaining Change in Universities. Мoscow: HSE Publishing</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit16"><label>16</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">кейс-стади и концепций. М.: Изд. дом ВШЭ, 2011. 312 с.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">House. (In Russian).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit17"><label>17</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Климонтович Ю. Л. Критерии относительной степени упорядоченности открытых систем // Успехи физических наук. 1996. Т. 166. С. 1231–1244. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3367/UFNr.0166.199611f.1231.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Chernavskiy, D. S. (2009). Synergy and Information. Dynamic theory of Information (3th ed.). Мoscow: URSS. (In Russian).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit18"><label>18</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Ленин В. И. Полн. собр. соч. Изд. 5-е. Т. 38. М., 1969. C. 97.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Descartes, R. (1989a). Discourse of the Method. Collected whritings (Vol. 1,</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit19"><label>19</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Лепский В. Е. Творцы, устремленные в будущее человечества:</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">pp. 153). Мoscow (In Russian).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit20"><label>20</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Н. Н. Моисеев и В. С. Степин // Философские науки. 2019. № 4. С. 63–</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Descartes, R. (1989b). Passions of the Soul. Collected whritings (Vol. 1,</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit21"><label>21</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">DOI: 10.30727/0235-1188-2019-62-4-63-75.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">pp. 481–572). Мoscow (In Russian).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit22"><label>22</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Морен Э. О сложностности. Пер. с англ. Я. И. Свирского, научн. ред.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Engels, F. (1961). Anti-Dühring. Collected writings (2th ed., Vol. 20, p. 21).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit23"><label>23</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">В. И. Аршинов. М.: Изд. Институт общегуманитарных исследований.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Мoscow. (In Russian).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit24"><label>24</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">284 с.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Foucault, P-М. (1996). The Archaeology of Knowledge. In B. Levchenko (Ed.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit25"><label>25</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Полани М. Личностное знание. На пути к посткритической философии /</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Kiev: Nika-Center. (In Russian).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit26"><label>26</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Под ред. В. А. Лекторского, В. А. Аршинова; пер. с англ. М. Б. Гнедовского и др. Благовещенск: БГК им. И. А. Бодуэна Де Куртенэ, 1998. 344 с.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Haken, H. (2001). Principles of Brain Functioning. Мoscow: Smysl. (In Russian).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit27"><label>27</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Погоняйло А. Г. Философия заводной игрушки, или Апология механицизма. СПб.: Изд-во СПб университета. 1998. 164 с.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Ivakhnenko, Е. N. (2013). Sociology meets complexity. RSUH/PGGUbulletin.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit28"><label>28</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Пригожин И., Николис Г. Познание сложного. М., 2008. 352 с.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Series: Philosophy, 11, 90–101. (In Russian).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit29"><label>29</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Пригожин И. От существующего к возникающему: Время и сложность</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Кlimontovich, Yu. L. (1996). Relative ordering criteria in open systems.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit30"><label>30</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">в физических науках / Пер. с англ. Ю. А. Данилова; под ред. Ю. Л. Климонтовича. М.: Наука, 1985.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Advances in Physical Sciences (Physics-Uspekhi), 166(2), 1231–1244.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit31"><label>31</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">с.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">DOI: https://doi.org/10.3367/UFNr.0166.199611f.1231. (In Russian).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit32"><label>32</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Фуко М. Археология знания. Пер. с фр. / Общ. ред. Бр. Левченко. Киев:</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Lenin, V. I. (1969). Collected whritings (5th ed., Vol. 38, p. 97). Moscow. (In Russian).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit33"><label>33</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Ника-Центр, 1996. 208 с.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Lepskiy, V. Е. (2019). The creators aspiring for the future of mankind: N. N. Moiseev and V. S. Stepin. Russian Journal of Philosophical Sciences, 62(4).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit34"><label>34</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Чернавский Д. С. Синергетика и информация. Динамическая теорияинформации. 3-е изд. доп. М.: URSS, 2009. 300 с.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">DOI: 10.30727/0235-1188-2019-62-4-63-75. (In Russian).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit35"><label>35</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Талеб Н. Черный лебедь. Под знаком непредсказуемости. М.: «Азбука», 2016. 736 с.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Моrin, E. (2019). About Complexity. Мoscow. (In Russian).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit36"><label>36</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Хакен Г. Принципы работы головного мозга. М.: Смысл, 2001. 351 с.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Nowotny, H. (2005). The increase of complexity and it’s reduction: emergent</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit37"><label>37</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Шлик М. Поворот в философии // Аналитическая философия. Избранные тексты. Сост., вступ. ст. и коммент. А. Ф. Грязнова. М.: Изд.-во МГУ, 1993. С. 28–33.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">interfaces between the natural sciences, humanities and social sciences.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit38"><label>38</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Энгельс Ф. Анти-Дюринг // Маркс К., Энгельс Ф. Собр. соч. Изд. 2-е.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Theory, culture and society, 22(5), 15–31.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit39"><label>39</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Т. 20. М., 1961. С. 21.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Pogonyailo, А. G. (1998). Philosophy of clock-work toys or the apology of mechanicalism. Saint Petersburg: Saint Petersburg University. (In Russian).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit40"><label>40</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Nowotny H. The increase of complexity and its reduction: emergent</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Polanyi, М. (1998). Perconal Knowledge. Towards a Post-Critical Philosophy.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit41"><label>41</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">interfaces between the natural sciences, humanities and social sciences //</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">In V. А. Lektorskiy &amp; V. A. Аrshinov (Eds.). Russia, Blagoveshchensk.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit42"><label>42</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Theory, culture and society. 2005. Vol. 22. № 5. P. 15–31.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">(In Russian).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit43"><label>43</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Prigogine, I. (1985). From Existing to the Arising. In Yu. L. Кlimontivitch (Ed.).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Prigogine, I. (1985). From Existing to the Arising. In Yu. L. Кlimontivitch (Ed.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit44"><label>44</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Мoscow: Nauka. (In Russian).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Мoscow: Nauka. (In Russian).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit45"><label>45</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Prigogine, I., &amp; Nikolis, G. (2008). Exploring complexity: An introduction.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Prigogine, I., &amp; Nikolis, G. (2008). Exploring complexity: An introduction.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit46"><label>46</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Moscow. (In Russian).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Moscow. (In Russian).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit47"><label>47</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Schlick, М. (1993). The turning point in philosophy. Analytic philosophy. Selected writings (pp. 28–33). Мoscow: Moscow State University Publishing</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Schlick, М. (1993). The turning point in philosophy. Analytic philosophy. Selected writings (pp. 28–33). Мoscow: Moscow State University Publishing</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit48"><label>48</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">House. (In Russian).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">House. (In Russian).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit49"><label>49</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Таleb, N. (2016). The Black Swan: The Impact of the Highly Improbable. Мoscow: Аzbuka. (In Russian).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Таleb, N. (2016). The Black Swan: The Impact of the Highly Improbable. Мoscow: Аzbuka. (In Russian).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref></ref-list><fn-group><fn fn-type="conflict"><p>The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.</p></fn></fn-group></back></article>
