1. Байбурин Р. Ф., Исаев Д. А., Каспржак А. Г. (2021). Новая старшая школа: основные черты модели, способы описания, инструменты оценки. Отечественная и зарубежная педагогика, 1(1(74)), 7–29.
2. Баранников К. А., Реморенко И. М. (2020). Как создаются результаты: методические подходы к проектированию образовательных результатов. Психолого-педагогические исследования, 12(2), 3–23. DOI:10.17759/psyedu.2020120201.
3. Воровщиков С. Г. (2020). Проектирование образовательной программы общеобразовательной организации: коллективный формат. Инновационная деятельность в образовании: Материалы XIV Международной научно-практической конференции, Москва, 15 апреля 2020 года (с. 124–129). М.: «Канцлер».
4. Иванова А. Е., Карданова-Бирюкова К. С. (2019). Создание русскоязычной версии международного инструмента оценивания ранних навыков чтения. Вопросы образования, (4), 93–115.
5. Исаева Н. В., Каспржак А. Г., Кобцева А. А. (2018). Экспертиза образовательных программ: концептуальная рамка, методика реализации. Педагогика, (12), 58–67.
6. Лазебникова А. Ю. (2019). Обновление ФГОС старшей школы: от теории к практике. Актуальные вопросы гуманитарных наук: теория, методика, практика: К 20-летию кафедры методики преподавания истории, обществознания и права: Сборник научных статей, Москва, 03 апреля 2019 года (с. 35–49). М.: ООО «Книгодел».
7. Гохберг Л. М., Озерова О. К., Саутина Е. В., Шугаль Н. Б. (2020). Образование в цифрах: 2020 : краткий статистический сборник. М.: НИУ ВШЭ.
8. Российская школа: начало XXI века. (2019). Серия коллективных монографий / С. Г. Косарецкий, К. А. Баранников, А. А. Беликов и др. М.: НИУ ВШЭ. ISBN 9785759819554. DOI 10.17323/978-5-7598-1955-4.
9. Федеральный государственный образовательный стандарт среднего общего образования [Электронный ресурс]. Одобрен решением от 17 мая 2012 г. № 413. URL
: https://fgosreestr.ru/educational_standard/federalnyi-gosudarstvennyi-obrazovatelnyi-standart-srednego-obshchego-obrazovaniia (дата обращения: 20.02.2021).
10. Чернобай Е. В., Лащук С. А. (2020). Картирование образовательной программы: возможности применения в российском контексте. Педагогика, (6), 58–67.
11. Чипышева Л. Н. (2020). Основные образовательные программы школы как инструмент развития профессиональной компетентности педагога. Тенденции развития науки и образования, 62-14, 54–59. DOI 10.18411/lj-06-2020-314.
12. Akomaning E. (2019). Improving Student Internship Through Collaborative Curriculum Design: Needs and Context Analysis to Inform the Design Process. In: Pieters J., Voogt J., Pareja Roblin N. (eds). Collaborative Curriculum Design for Sustainable Innovation and Teacher Learning. Springer, Cham.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-20062-6_6 13. Anto A. G., Coenders F. (2019). Facilitator and Peer Support in Collaborative Curriculum Design. In: Pieters J., Voogt J., Pareja Roblin N. (eds). Collaborative Curriculum Design for Sustainable Innovation and Teacher Learning. Springer, Cham.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-20062-6_12 14. Bakah M. A. B., Nihuka K. A., Anto A. G. (2019). Fostering the Sustainability and Scalability of Curriculum Innovations Through Collaborative Design. In: Pieters J., Voogt J., Pareja Roblin N. (eds). Collaborative Curriculum Design for Sustainable Innovation and Teacher Learning. Springer, Cham.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-20062-6_18 15. Becuwe H., Tondeur J., Pareja Roblin N., Thys J., & Castelein E. (2016). Teacher design teams as a strategy for professional development: the role of the facilitator. EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH AND EVALUATION, 22(3–4), 141–154.
https://doi.org/10.1080/13803611.2016.1247724 16. Bezzina M. (1991). Teachers' perceptions of their participation in school-based curriculum development: a case study. Curriculum Perspectives, 11 (2), 39–47.
17. Brady L. (1992). Curriculum development: fourth edition. Sydney: Prentice Hall.
18. Braun V., Clarke V. (2006). 'Using thematic analysis in psychology Using thematic analysis in psychology', 3(2), 77–101. doi: 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa.
19. Day C. (1990). United Kingdom: Managing Curriculum Development at Branston School and Community College. In C. Marsh, C. Day, L. Hannay, & G. McCutcheon (еds.), Reconceptualising school-based curriculum development (pp. 140–172). London: The Falmer Press.
20. Gjersing et al.: Cross-cultural adaptation of research instruments: language, setting, time and statistical considerations. BMC Medical Research Methodology 2010 10:13. doi:10.1186/1471-2288-10-13.
21. Gordon William R. et al. Developing the Curriculum, 9th Edition. William R. Gordon, Rosemarye T. Taylor, Peter F. Oliva 2019 Pearson.
22. Hannay L. (1990). Canada: School-based curriculum deliberation. In: C. Marsh, C. Day, L. Hannay, & G. McCutcheon (
еds.), Reconceptualising school-based curriculum development (pp. 140–172). London: The Falmer Press.
23. Jenkins G. (2020). Teacher agency: The effects of active and passive responses to curriculum change. The Australian Educational Researcher, 47/1, 167–181.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13384-019-00334-2 24. Jimes C., Weiss S., Keep R. (2013). Addressing the Local in Localization: A Case Study of Open Textbook Adoption by Three South African Teachers. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 17(2), 73–86 Jul 2013.
25. Joke M. Voogt, Jules M. Pieters & Adam Handelzalts (2016). Teacher collaboration in curriculum design teams: effects, mechanisms, and conditions, Educational Research and Evaluation, 22:3-4, 121–140. DOI: 10.1080/13803611.2016.1247725.
26. Keiny S. (1993). School‐based Curriculum Development as a Process of Teachers' Professional Development, Educational Action Research, 1:1, 65–93. DOI: 10.1080/0965079930010105
27. Marsh C. (1990). Australia: establishing a Unit Curriculum for Years 8-10 at River Valley Senior High School. In: C. Marsh, C. Day, L. Hannay, G. McCutcheon (еds.), Reconceptualising school-based curriculum development (pp.73–97). London: The Falmer Press.
28. Marsh Colin J. (2009). Key concepts for understanding curriculum. London: New York: Routledge.
29. McCutcheon G. (1990). United States of America: school-based curriculum development in Chester: revising a curriculum. In: C. Marsh, C. Day, L. Hannay, & G. McCutcheon (еds.), Reconceptualising school-based curriculum development (pp. 99–121). London: The Falmer Press.
30. OECD. (2020). Curriculum Overload: A Way Forward, OECD Publishing, Paris.
https://doi.org/10.1787/3081ceca-en 31. OECD. (2020). TALIS 2018 Results (Volume II): Teachers and School Leaders as Valued Professionals, TALIS, OECD Publishing, Paris.
https://doi.org/10.1787/19cf08df-en 32. OECD Curriculum (re)design. A series of thematic reports from the Education 2030 project. OVERVIEW BROCHURE. URL:
https://www.oecd.org/education/2030-project/contact/brochure-thematic-reports-on-curriculum-redesign.pdf (дата обращения: 22.02.2022).
33. Sabar N., Rudduck J., & Reid W. (1987). Partnership and autonomy in school-based curriculum development. University of Sheffield: Division of Education.
34. Salleh Hairon, Jonathan Wee Pin Goh, Catherine Siew Kheng Chua & Li-yi Wang. (2017). A research agenda for professional learning communities: moving forward, Professional Development in Education, 43:1, 72–86. DOI: 10.1080/19415257.2015.1055861.
35. Short E. C. (1983). The forms and use of alternative curriculum development strategies: policy implications, Curriculum. Inquiry, 13, pp. 43–67.
36. Skilbeck M. (1984). School-based curriculum development. London: Harper and Row.
37. Van den Akker J. (2018). Future of Education and Skills 2030: Curriculum Analysis. Bridging curriculum design and implementation; 8th Informal Working Group (IWG) Meeting OECD Conference Centre, Paris, France.
38. Wang L., Chen D., & Neo W. (2019). Studying the enactment of School-Based Curriculum Development (SBCD) in Singapore. Educational Research, 61(3), 337–355.
39. Wang N. (2020). An investigation of School-Based Curriculum Development in Chinese state-run high schools: A multi-cases study on curriculum leadership and teacher participation (PhD thesis).
40. Zhou W., Cui Y. (2020). Achievements, Challenges, and Prospects of School-Based Curriculum in China. In Y. Cui et al. (eds.), School-Based Curriculum in China, Curriculum Reform and School Innovation in China,
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-8630-4_3