Independent assessment of the quality of educational activity conditions
Abstract
The study is devoted to the system of independent assessment of
the quality of educational activity conditions (NOKO). The authors discuss their findings in interviews with 10 respondents-experts who have experience working with the system of independent assessment of the quality of education at different levels. The authors conclude that to date, the system of independent assessment of the quality of educational activities is not used as a real management or monitoring tool in the regions.the results of
this assessment are formal reports that are repeated from year to
year, and usually do not take into account the peculiarities of local and regional educational systems.
The experts interviewed do not see any sense in the current
implementation of procedures for independent assessment of the
quality of educational activities. They have an internal belief that
the system does not solve important social problems, but can formally confirm the existence of democratic institutions. However, some of the experts noted that the ”futility“ of procedures has a side effect on the work of the education system: the organization of procedures requires time and financial resources.
Regulation of the NOKO system is currently concentrated at the Federal level. It seems that the Federal criteria for independent evaluation of the quality of educational activities should be of a framework nature, and the specific indicators that are evaluated should be set at the regional level. This approach will take into account the specifics of the regional education system and the existing conditions in the region, and at the same time will ensure the use of evaluation results in making management decisions
About the Authors
Szymon V. JANKIEWICZRussian Federation
PhD in law, Director of the Center for Education Law of the
Institute of Education
Nadezhda V. KNYAGININA
Russian Federation
Researcher of Centre for Educational Law in the Institute of
Education
Еvgeniy V. PUCHKOV
Russian Federation
Analyst of Centre for Educational Law in the Institute of Education
References
1. Jankiewicz, S. V., Кnyaginina, N. V., & Vorob’ev, V. V. (2019). State accreditaion
2. of universities: conflicts of declared and actual goals. Education policy,
3. –2 (77–78), pp. 76–86. (In Russian).
4. The Department of education of the Yamal-Nenets Autonomous district.
5. (2014). No. 454 on the independent system for evaluating the quality of educational organizations in the Yamal-Nenets Autonomous district. Retrieved
6. from https://base.garant.ru/27944245/. (In Russian).
7. The Department of education of the Yamal-Nenets Autonomous district. (2016). No. 638 On the organization and conduct of an independent
8. assessment of the quality of education of organizations providing services
9. in the field of education of the Yamal-Nenets Autonomous district for the
10. period 2016–2020. Retrieved from http://www.yamaledu.org/activity/
11. regional_system_for_assessing_the_quality_of_education/nezavisimaya-ocenka-kachestva-obrazovatelnyh-uslug/13838-prikaz-do-yanao-ot-20160504–638.html. (In Russian).
12. The Department of education of the Yamal-Nenets Autonomous district.
13. (2019). Minutes of the meeting of the Public Council under the Department
14. of education of the Yamal Autonomous district on conducting an independent assessment of the quality of educational activities by organizations #4.
15. Retrieved from https://bus.gov.ru/public-rating/api/normativedocuments/449296. (In Russian).
16. The Executive committee of Muslyumovsky municipal district of the Republic of
17. Tatarstan. (2017). Information about the results of an independent assessment of the quality of services provided by educational organizations in the Muslyumovsky municipal district of the Republic of Tatarstan. Retrieved from
18. https://bus.gov.ru/pub/independentRating/detailsNew/3595. (In Russian).
19. The Committee for education of St. Petersburg. (2017). Information about the
20. results of an independent assessment of the quality of services provided
21. by organizations in the education sector of St. Petersburg. Retrieved from
22. https://bus.gov.ru/pub/independentRating/detailsNew/21084. (In Russian).
23. The Committee for education of St. Petersburg. (2018). Information about the
24. results of an independent assessment of the quality of services provided
25. by organizations in the education sector of St. Petersburg. Retrieved from
26. https://bus.gov.ru/pub/independentRating/detailsNew/41822. (In Russian).
27. The Ministry of education and science of the Chelyabinsk region. (2017).
28. Information about the results of an independent assessment of the quality
29. of services provided by educational organizations in the Chelyabinsk
30. region. Retrieved from https://bus.gov.ru/pub/independentRating/detailsNew/22041. (In Russian).
31. The Ministry of education of the Irkutsk region. (2018). Information about the
32. results of an independent assessment of the quality of services provided by
33. educational organizations in the Irkutsk region. Retrieved from https://bus.
34. gov.ru/pub/independentRating/detailsNew/50124. (In Russian).
35. The Ministry of education of the Moscow region. (2017). Information about the
36. results of an independent assessment of the quality of services provided by
37. educational organizations in the Moscow region. Retrieved from https://bus.
38. gov.ru/pub/independentRating/detailsNew/33981. (In Russian).
39. The Ministry of Education of the Russian Federation. (2019). No. 114
40. On approval of indicators. Retrieved from http://docs.cntd.ru/document/553940615. (In Russian).
41. The Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation. (2019). No. 31N On approval of indicators. Retrieved from http://docs.cntd.ru/document/554403374. (In Russian).
42. The Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation.
43. (2019). No. 30N On approval of indicators. Retrieved from http://docs.cntd.
44. ru/document/554403375. (In Russian).
45. The Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2018). PISA
46. results 2018. Retrieved from https://www.oecd.org/pisa/publications/
47. pisa-2018-results.htm
48. The State Duma of the Russian Federation. (2014). No. 256-FZ About modification of separate legislative acts of the Russian Federation concerning carrying out an independent assessment of quality of rendering of services by the
49. organizations in the sphere of culture, social service, health protection and
50. education. Retrieved from https://base.garant.ru/70701066/. (In Russian).
51. The State Duma of the Russian Federation. (2017). No. 392-FZ On amendments
52. to certain legislative acts of the Russian Federation on improvement of an
53. independent assessment of the quality of conditions for rendering services
54. by organizations in the field of culture, health, education, social services and
55. Federal institutions of medico-social examination. Retrieved from https://
56. www.garant.ru/products/ipo/prime/doc/71725214/. (In Russian).
57. The Voynovskiy the administration of the rural settlement. (2018). Information
58. about the results of an independent assessment of the quality of services provided by educational organizations in the Chelyabinsk region. Retrieved from
59. https://bus.gov.ru/pub/independentRating/detailsNew/43381. (In Russian).
Review
For citations:
JANKIEWICZ S.V., KNYAGININA N.V., PUCHKOV Е.V. Independent assessment of the quality of educational activity conditions. Educational Policy. 2020;(1 (81)):60-74.
JATS XML






