Comprehensive approach to measuring well-being and quality of life considering human potential indicators

The article is devoted to the prerequisites for the development of well-being comprehensive assessments, including assessment of various aspects of the individuals lives and society as a whole. Different approaches may include different aspects of well-being such as material well-being, health, education, subjective well-being, work, infrastructure, safety, housing, ecology, the structure of time budgets, civil rights, etc. Comprehensive assessments approaches became widely used after it was proven that specific economic indicators i.e. GDP or income level do not show a broad picture of people’s actual well-being. The chapter also summarizes and gives structure to key trends in the comprehensive approache development in well-being measuring, including multi-domain, methodological sophistication, correlation with strategic development goals in a certain territory, adjustment for inequality, the use of subjective and objective indicators, and reflection of human potential indicators. The authors show that the modern understanding of well-being and quality of life cannot be imagined without taking into account aspects of human development. Moreover, these concepts and approaches to their measurement are closely intertwined and their correlation requires further theoretical and methodological elaboration.

1. Болгов В. И. (1964). Внерабочее время и уровень жизни трудящихся. Редакционно-издательский отдел Сибирского отделения АН СССР.

2. Ларин А. В., Филясов С. В. (2018). Парадокс Истерлина и адаптация в России. Экономический журнал Высшей школы экономики, 22(1), 59–83.

3. Леонтьев Д. А. (2020). Качество жизни и благополучие: объективные, субъективные и субъектные аспекты. Психологический журнал, 41(6), 86–95. DOI: 10.31857/S020595920012592–7.

4. Патрушев В. Д. (1969). Бюджет времени как метод измерения уровня жизни населения. Москва. 21 с.

5. Atkinson A. B. et al. (1970). On the measurement of inequality. Journal of economic theory, 2(3), 244–263.

6. Bhanojirao V. V. (1991). Human development report 1990: review and assessment. World Development, 19(10), 1451–1460. DOI:10.1016/0305–750x(91)90087-x.

7. Brown J., Bowling A., Flynn T. (2004). Models of quality of life: A taxonomy, overview and systematic review of the literature. European Forum on Population Ageing Research.

8. Delhey J. et al. (2002). Quality of life in a European perspective: The EUROMODULE as a new instrument for comparative welfare research. Assessing quality of life and living conditions to guide national policy, 163–176. Springer, Dordrecht. DOI: 10.2307/27527006.

9. Diener E., Suh E. (1997). Measuring quality of life: Economic, social, and subjective indicators. Social indicators research, 40, 189–216.

10. Easterlin R. A. (1974). Does economic growth improve the human lot? Some empirical evidence. Nations and households in economic growth, 89–125. Academic press. DOI:10.1016/b978–0–12–205050–3.50008–7.

11. Easterlin R. A., O’Connor K. J. (2020). The Easterlin Paradox. IZA Discussion Papers, 13923, 1–25. Institute of Labor Economics (IZA). Bonn. DOI: 10.1007/978–3–319–57365–6_184–2.

12. Flax M. J. (1972). A Study in Comparative Urban Indicators: Conditions in 18 Large Metropolitan Areas.

13. Kahn R. L., Juster F. T. (2002). Well-Being: concepts and measures. Journal of social Issues, 58(4), 627–644. DOI: 10.1057/9780230625600.

14. Lange G. M., Wodon Q., Carey K. (ed.). (2018). The changing wealth of nations 2018: Building a sustainable future. World Bank Publications.

15. Meeberg G. A. (1993). Quality of life: a concept analysis. Journal of advanced nursing, 18(1), 32–38. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365–2648.1993.18010032.x.

16. Noll H. H. (2004). Social indicators and quality of life research: Background, achievements and current trends. Advances in sociological knowledge: Over half a century, 151–181. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. DOI: 10.1007/978–3–663–09215–5_7.

17. Ruta D., Camfield L., Donaldson C. (2007). Sen and the art of quality of life maintenance: Towards a general theory of quality of life and its causation. The Journal of Socio-Economics, 36(3), 397–423. DOI: 10.1016/j.socec.2006.12.004.

18. Stiglitz J. E. et al. (2009). Report by the commission on the measurement of economic performance and social progress.

19. Ul Haq M. (1995). Reflections on human development. Oxford University Press.

20. Veenhoven R. (2013). The four qualities of life ordering concepts and measures of the good life. The Exploration of Happiness, 195–226. DOI: 10.1007/978–94–007–5702–8_11.