Preview

Educational Policy

Advanced search

Personality potential: optics of psychology

https://doi.org/10.22394/2078-838X-2023-2-20-31

Abstract

The paper considers the concept of personality potential (LP), introduced by the author to designate a system of psychological characteristics of a person that are important for the successful solution of life tasks. The personality potential as the core of the personality accounts for the capacity to function as an autonomous agent, rather than just following internal impulses or pressures of the external environment, to navigate in the constantly changing world, guided by one’s goals and meanings. Personality potential is conceived in the author’s approach as the potential of autoregulation. The essence of autoregulation as a general explanatory principle of the activity of living and quasi-living systems is that one’s actions on the way to the goal are not set in advance or programmed in detail, but are continuously corrected under the influence of incoming feedback information about whether one is approaching the desired incentive or missing it. Thus, personality potential includes those personality characteristics due to which the subject can successfully carry out the autoregulation functions. Personality potential is also viewed as a systemic organization of psychological resources of the individual, which largely determine whether the person will be the beneficiary of their own human potential resources, whether one will be able to put them at the service of one’s own autonomous motives and goal-setting, laying an independent trajectory in a changeable environment, or will inertly follow uncontrolled impulses, someone else’s will or pressure from external circumstances. A person as a carrier of personality potential disposes of oneself as a carrier of resources, or as an element of human capital. The three main substructures and functions of the LP include 1) self-orientation in the uncertain situations, weighting alternatives and choosing goals and priorities, 2) attainment – paving the optimal path to the goal based on available resources, and 3) preservation – evasion and protection from external threats and pressures that seek to disrupt one’s plans, force one to change.

About the Author

D. A. Leontiev
National Research University Higher School of Economics
Russian Federation

Dmitry A. Leontiev - Ph.D., Professor, National Research University Higher School of Economics, Head. Laboratory, Chief Researcher, International laboratory of positive personality psychology and motivation. Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Psychology

109028, Moscow, Pokrovsky boulevard, 11

ResearcherID: I-1260-2012



References

1. Asmolov A. G., Shekhter E. D., & Chernorizov A. M. (2017). Preadaptation to Uncertainty as a Strategy of Navigation of Developing Systems. Voprosy Psichologii, 4, 3–26. (in Russ.).

2. Genisaretski O. I., Nosov N. A., Yudin B. G. (1996). Conception of Human Potential: Initial Considerations. Chelovek, 4, 5–21. (in Russ.).

3. Gordeeva T. O. (2006). The Psychology of Achievement Motivation. Moscow: Smysl. (in Russ.).

4. Gordeeva T. O., Leontiev D. A., Osin E. N. (2011). The Contribution of Personality Potential to Academic Achievements. In: Leontiev D. (ed.) Personality Potential: Structure and Assessment. Moscow: Smysl. P. 642– 668. (in Russ.).

5. Janet P. (1929). L’évolution psychologique de la personnalité. Paris: Éditions A. Chahine. (in Russ.).

6. Ivanova T. Y., Leontiev D. A., Osin E. N., Rasskazova E. I., & Kosheleva N. V. (2018). Sovremennye problemy izucheniya lichnostnykh resursov v professional’noy deyatel’nosti [Contemporary Issues in the Research of Personality Resources at Work]. Organizacionnaâ psihologiâ (Organizational Psychology), 8(1), 85–121. (in Russ.).

7. Ivanchenko G. V., Leontiev D. A., Plotnikova A. V. (2011). The Idea of Potential in Human Sciences. In: Leontiev D. (ed.) Personality Potential: Structure and Assessment. Moscow: Smysl. P. 42–58. (in Russ.).

8. Leontiev D. A. (1993). An Essay in the Psychology of Personality. Moscow: Smysl. (in Russ.).

9. Leontiev D. A. (1999). The Psychology of Personal Meaning. Moscow: Smysl. (in Russ.).

10. Leontiev D. A. (2002). The Personal in the Person: Personality Potential as the Basis of Self-Determination. Proceedings of the Chair of General Psychology of Lomonossov Moscow State University. Vol.1. / ed. by B. S. Bratus & D. A. Leontiev. Moscow: Smysl. P. 56–65 (in Russ.).

11. Leontiev D. A. (2006). Personality Potential as the Potential of Autoregulation. Proceedings of the Chair of General Psychology of Lomonossov Moscow State University. Vol. 2. / ed. by B. S. Bratus & E. E. Sokolova. Moscow: Smysl. P. 85–105 (in Russ.).

12. Leontiev D. A. (2010). Psychological Resources of Overcoming Stressful Situations: Toward Clarification of Basic Constructs. In: Psychology of Stress and Coping Behavior in the Present-day Russian Society. Proceedings of the 2nd International Scientific and Practical Conference. Kostroma, Russia. Vol. 2. P. 40–42. (in Russ.).

13. Leontiev D. (ed.). (2011a). Personality Potential: Structure and Assessment. Moscow: Smysl (in Russ.).

14. Leontiev D. A. (2011b). Introduction: Personality Potential as the Object of Study. In: D. Leontiev (ed.). Personality Potential: Structure and Assessment. Moscow: Smysl. P. 5–11. (in Russ.).

15. Leontiev D. A. (2011c). Intermediate results: from an idea to the conception, from variables to a systems model, from questions to new questions. In: D. Leontiev (ed.). Personality Potential: Structure and Assessment. Moscow: Smysl. P. 669–675. (in Russ.).

16. Leontiev D. A. (2011d). Autoregulation as an object of study and as an explanatory principle. In: V. I. Morosanova (ed.). The psychology of self-regulation in the 21st century. St.Petersburg: Nestor-History. P. 74–89. (in Russ.).

17. Leontiev D. A. (2011e). Self-organization of living systems and the physiology of behavior. Mir Psichologii. No 2 (66). P. 16–27. (in Russ.).

18. Leontiev D. A. (2013). The Personality Dimension of Human Development. Voprosy Psichologii, 3, 67–80. (in Russ.).

19. Leontiev D. A. (2014). Personality Development in Normal and Complicated Conditions. Cultural-Historical Psychology, 10(3), 97–106. (in Russ.).

20. Leontiev D. A. (2016a). Autoregulation, Resources, and Personality Potential. Siberian Psychological Journal. No 62. P. 18–37. (in Russ.).

21. Leontiev D. A. (2016b). Existentialist Approach in the Present-day Personality Psychology. Voprosy Psichologii. No 3. P. 3–15. (in Russ.).

22. Leontiev D. A. (2019a). Three Targets: Personality Potential – Why, What, and How. Educational Politics. No 3 (79). P. 10–16. (in Russ.).

23. Leontiev D. A. (2019b). Roy Baumeister’s Self-Regulation Theory and Research. Voprosy Psichologii. No 6. P. 35–45. (in Russ.).

24. Leontiev D. A., Aleksandrova L. A., Lebedeva A. A. (2016). Personality Development and Psychological Support of Physically Challenged Students in the Conditions of Inclusive Professional Education. Moscow: Smysl. (in Russ.).

25. Leontiev D. A., Mandrikova E. Yu., Osin E. N., Plotnikova A. V., Rasskazova E. I. (2007). An Attempt of Structural Assessment of Personality Potential. Psychological Assessment, 1, 8–31. (in Russ.).

26. Makhnach A. V. (2016). Living Capacity of a Person and a Family: A Social Psychological Paradigm. Moscow: RAS Institute of Psychology. (in Russ.).

27. Petrovsky V. A. (2011). A Person above the Situation. Moscow: Smysl. (in Russ.).

28. Sartre J.-P. (1946). L’existentialisme est un humanisme. Paris: Nagel.

29. Heckhausen H. (1989). Motivation und Handeln. 2 Aufl. Berlin: Springer.

30. Amabile T. M. (2001). Beyond Talent: John Irving and the Passionate Craft of Creativity. American Psychologist, 56, 4, 333–336.

31. Baumeister R. F., Bratslavsky E., Muraven M., & Tice D. M. (1998). Ego depletion: Is the active self a limited resource? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(5), 1252–1265. DOI: 10.1037//0022–3514.74.5.1252.

32. Csikszentmihalyi M. (2003). Good Business: Leadership, Flow, and the Making of Meaning. – New York (NY): Penguin.

33. Csikszentmihalyi M. (2004). Materialism and the evolution of consciousness. In: Kasser T., Kanner A. D. (Еds.). Psychology and Consumer Culture: The Struggle for a Good Life in a Materialistic World. – Washington (DC): American Psychological Association, P. 91–106.

34. Deci E. & Flaste R. (1995). Why We Do What We Do: Understanding Selfmotivation. New York (NY): Penguin. 1995.

35. Duckworth A. L., & Seligman M. E. P. (2005). Self-discipline outdoes IQ predicting academic performance in adolescents. Psychological Science, 16(12), 939–944. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467–9280.2005.01641.x.

36. Luthans F., Youssef C. M., & Avolio B. J. (2007). Psychological Capital: Developing the Human Competitive Edge. – New York (NY): Oxford University Press.


Review

For citations:


Leontiev D.A. Personality potential: optics of psychology. Educational Policy. 2023;(2):20-31. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.22394/2078-838X-2023-2-20-31

Views: 132

JATS XML


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2078-838X (Print)
ISSN 2949-0987 (Online)