The Intelligence Crisis of 2028: The image of AI-resilient education

   The article examines the anthropological and institutional challenges confronting the education system amid the mass integration of generative artificial intelligence. Drawing on Citrini Research’s macroeconomic scenario of the «intelligence displacement spiral» and the «zero friction» phenomenon, the author projects economic trends onto pedagogical reality. The traditional educational model — which has historically operated by exploiting the «information asymmetry» between teacher and student — definitively loses its purpose when any search algorithm can instantly produce a competent answer. The article analyzes current empirical research on «cognitive offloading,» revealing a central paradox of AI in education: tools that reduce cognitive strain simultaneously erode critical thinking metrics. To conceptualize this deadlock, a historical parallel is introduced: just as the mechanization of heavy labor in the 19th century compelled society to build gymnasiums to preserve physical health, cognitive automation demands that the school be transformed into a specialized space for deliberate intellectual resistance. The architecture of such spaces is shaped by empirically grounded mechanics — Manu Kapur’s «productive failure» and Robert Bjork’s «desirable difficulties» — which demonstrate that deep understanding requires an initial confrontation with a task that appears, at first, unsolvable. The proposed AI-resilience strategy is grounded in a synthesis of L.S. Vygotsky’s zone of proximal development, V.V. Davydov’s theory of the educational task, and the ancient tradition of paideia. The paper ultimately argues for an inevitable shift in educational policy — from compensating for information deficits toward the intentional design of productive struggle. In this framework, the educator takes on the role of an architect of existential experience, sustaining the student within the space of independent inquiry.

1. Выготский, Л. С. (1984). Собрание сочинений: В 6 т. Т. 4. Детская психология. Педагогика.

2. Давыдов, В. В. (1996). Теория развивающего обучения. ИНТОР.

3. Ильенков, Э. В. (1964). Школа должна учить мыслить. Московский психолого- социальный институт.

4. Йегер, В. (2001). Пайдейя. Воспитание античного грека. Греко-латинский кабинет Ю. А. Шичалина.

5. Уваров, А. Ю., Гейбл, Э., Дворецкая, И. В., и др. (2019). В А. Ю. Уваров, И. Д. Фрумин (Ред.), Трудности и перспективы цифровой трансформации образования. Издательский дом Высшей школы экономики.

6. Bjork, E. L., & Bjork, R. A. (2011). Making things hard on yourself, but in a good way: Creating desirable difficulties to enhance learning. In M. A. Gernsbacher et al. (Eds.), Psychology and the real world: Essays illustrating fundamental contributions to society (pp. 55–64). Worth Publishers.

7. Grinschgl, S., & Neubauer, A. C. (2022). Supporting cognition with modern technology: Distributed cognition today and in an AI-enhanced future. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence, 5, 908261. doi: 10.3389/frai.2022.908261

8. Hamedi, S., & Ali, A. (2025). AI as a digital scaffold: An integrative review of artificial intelligence, adaptive learning, and Vygotsky’s zone of proximal development. International Journal of Modern Education, 7(26), 579–589. doi: 10.35631/IJMOE.726038

9. Hong, H., Vate- U-Lan, P., & Viriyavejakul, C. (2025). Cognitive offload instruction with generative AI: A quasi-experimental study on critical thinking gains in English writing. Forum for Linguistic Studies, 7(7), 325–334. doi: 10.30564/fls.v7i7.10072

10. Jose, B., Cherian, J., Verghis, A. M., Varghese, S. M., et al. (2025). The cognitive paradox of AI in education: Between enhancement and erosion. Frontiers in Psychology, 16, 1550621. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1550621

11. Kapur, M. (2014). Productive failure in learning math. Cognitive Science, 38(5), 1008–1022. doi: 10.1111/cogs.12107

12. Kapur, M. (2015). Learning from productive failure. Learning: Research and Practice, 1(1), 51–65. doi: 10.1080/23735082.2015.1002195

13. Moluayonge, G. E. (2025). Cognitive offload as a mediator of AI usage and critical thinking development in Cameroonian higher education learners. Asian Journal of Education and Social Studies, 51(8), 467–476. doi: 10.9734/ajess/2025/v51i82253