ABOUT TEACHERS’ PROFESSIONAL DEFICITS: What competencies do teachers and parents need

In the article, the authors evaluate the methods and results of
the All-Russian online test of pedagogical literacy among teachers in grades 10-11, as well as analyze the identified professional deficits and give recommendations on how to minimize them.
The authors find it convincing that close attention to the problem
of professional deficits in teachers, the search for and large-scale
implementation of effective ways to overcome such deficiencies in the continuous education system is the key to high-quality staffing of the education system, and, as a consequence, an increased level of education in Russian society. The study is based on an online survey of teachers of educational organizations in Russia and an expert survey of specialists in the field of education. The survey methodology is based on the materials of preschool education specialists from the RYBAKOV PRODETEI and RYBAKOV PLAYSCHOOL projects, experts in online education First.School, Teen.Study, authors and editors of the book publishing house Alpina Pablisher, experts from leading Russian universities, such as: Moscow Pedagogical State University, Russian State Vocational Pedagogical University, Novgorod State University named after Yaroslav the Wise. Thanks to this methodology, an “Online test” is held throughout Russia to identify teachers and parents with modern knowledge in the field of pedagogy, psychology, education, didactics and make recommendations for improving their competencies. According to the results of a study of the results of the “online test” and an expert survey, the authors of the article revealed professional deficiencies in the psychological and pedagogical literacy of teachers, in matters of upbringing and career guidance. The consequences of pedagogical literacy deficiencies are predicted and recommendations are given for their prevention and elimination.

1. Alieva, L. V., Grigor’ev, D. V., et al. (2010). Assessment of the quality of education in educational institutions of the city of Moscow. Moscow. (In Russian).

2. An online test on pedagogical literacy will assess the level of skill of teachers and parents. (2021). Retrieved from https://www.dvfu.ru/schools/school_of_education/news/online-zachet-po-ped-gramotnosti-202104/. (In Russian).

3. Andryuhina, L. M., Lomovceva, N. V., et al. (2021). Readiness of vocational education teachers to work in a digital educational environment. Modern problems of science and education, 2. Retrieved from http://www.science-education.ru/ru/article/view?id=30563. (In Russian).

4. Blinov, V. I., Esenina, E. Yu., Rodichev, N. F., Sergeev, I. S. (2021). What is upbringing in modern secondary vocational education?. Vocational education and the labor market, 2, 4–14.

5. https://doi.org/10.52944/PORT.2021.45.2.001. (In Russian).

6. Ezechil, L., Coman, P. (2012). Analysis of didacticians’ psycho-pedagogical competences. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 33, 233–237. (In Russian).

7. Grebneva, D. M. (2021). Management of project activities of schoolchildren in the context of distance learning. INSIGHT, 3(6), 22–30. https://doi.org/10.17853/2686-8970/2021-3-22-30. (In Russian).

8. Konovalov, A. A., Chebykina, I. V. (2021). Professional and pedagogical deficiencies of teachers of the secondary vocational education system: research results. INSIGHT, 2(5), 7–18. https://doi.org/10.17853/2686-8970/2021-2-7-18.

9. (In Russian).

10. Meroño L., Calderón A., Arias-Estero J. L. (2021). Digital pedagogy and

11. cooperative learning: Effect on the technological pedagogical content knowledge and academic achievement of pre-service teachers. Revista de Psicodidáctica (English ed.), 26(1), 53–61. (In Russian).

12. Online test in pedagogical literacy. (n. d.). Retrieved from https://zachetpedagog.ru/. (In Russian).

13. Pudenko, T. I., Potemkina, T. V., Rudneva, A. A. (2017). External assessment of the quality of general education as a factor in the professional development of teachers. Education and Science, 19(6), 52–70.

14. DOI: 10.17853/1994-5639-2017-6-52-70. (In Russian).

15. RGSU. (2016). Social pedagogy a short dictionary of concepts and terms. Retrieved from https://didacts.ru/termin/pedagogicheskaja-gramotnost.html. (In Russian).

16. Shmigirilova, I. B., Rvanova, A. S., Grigorenko, O. V. (2021). Assessment in education: current trends, problems and contradictions (review of scientific publications). Education and Science, 23(6), 43–83.

17. https://doi.org/10.17853/1994-5639-2021-6-43-83. (In Russian).

18. Smirnova, S. V., Kiseleva, A. K. (2017). Overcoming professional deficiencies of teachers in the system of additional professional education. Scientific support of the system of advanced training of personnel, 3(32), 29–34. (In

19. Russian).

20. VCIOM. (2019). School education: tasks, priorities, needs. Retrieved from https://wciom.ru/analytical-reviews/analiticheskii-obzor/shkolnoe-obrazovanie-zadachi-prioritety-potrebnosti. (In Russian).

21. Vol’chik, V. V., Posuhova, O. Yu. (2017). Reforms in the field of education and precariatisation of teachers.TERRA ECONOMICUS, 2, 122–138.

22. https://doi.org/10.23683/2073-6606-2017-15-2-122-138. (In Russian).

23. Willms, J. Douglas. (2018). Learning Divides: Using Monitoring Data to Inform Education Policy. Montreal: UNESCO Institute for Statistics.

24. Zaglodina, T. A., Pankratova, L. E. (2021). Cyberbullying in the educational process: research experience in the student environment. INSIGHT, 3(6), 53–63. https://doi.org/10.17853/2686-8970/2021-3-53-63.

25. (In Russian).

26. Zemlyanuhina, N. S., Kuznecov, P. S. (2015). The impact of changes in the USE on vocational guidance of schoolchildren. Vocational guidance, 2. Retrieved from https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/vliyanie-izmeneniy-ege-na-proforientatsiyu-shkolnikov. (In Russian)