Experience of the Department of Education andScience of the city of Moscow. How to replace schools’ struggle for resources with a competition for learning outcomes
Abstract
The article discuses the outcome of OECD’s Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA-2018) with the focus on
the success of Moscow students there, as related to changes in
the management of the Moscow education system. The ranking of the Moscow schools in PISA is comparable with the results of such recognized best schools in the world as the schools
of Shanghai (China), Singapore, Hong Kong (China). Their results
outperform the most of OECD countries. Regarding the quality of
education, Russia is going to become one of the top 10 countries by the end of 2024. Each country’s position in this ranking list is going to be based on PIRLS, TIMSS, and PISA research. The global system changes of secondary education in Moscow, addressed in
the article, will appeal, therefore, to policy-makers and researchers seeking to understand the quality-of-education related processes in the Russian regions
About the Author
Elena V. CHERNOBAYRussian Federation
Doctor of pedagogical Sciences, Professor
References
1. Chernobay, Е. V. (2015). Logic of changes in the Moscow education system.
2. Мoscow: Prosveshcheniye. (In Russian).
3. Chernobay, Е. V. (2016). The school they study at. Moscow: Prosveshcheniye.
4. (In Russian).
5. Day, C., Sammons, P., Leithwood, K., Hopkins, D., Harris, A., Gu, Q., & Brown,
6. E. (2010). Ten strong claims about successful school leadership. Nottingham: NCSL.
7. Duke, D. L. (2015). Leadership for Low-Performing Schools: A Step-By-Step Guide
8. to the School Turnaround Process. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
9. Hallinger, P. (2018). Bringing context out of the shadows of leadership. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 46 (1), pp. 5–24.
10. Hammersley-Fletcher, L. (2018) Re-figuring the world of educational leadership:
11. Struggles with performance, disenfranchisement and critical consciousness. In Educational Leadership: Theorising Professional Practice in
12. Neoliberal Times, pp. 27–41. doi.org/10.4324/9781315620572
13. Каlina, I. I. (2016). A city is a school open to students. Uchitelskaya gazeta.
14. Retrieved from http://www.ug.ru/archive/67193 Uchitelskaya gazeta.
15. (In Russian)
16. Каlina, I. I. (2013). We were looking for freedom? The dream come true. School
17. management — first of September, 12, pp. 4–8. (In Russian)
18. Levin, H., & Kelly, C. (1994) Can education do it alone? Economics of Education
19. Review 13 (2), 97–108.
20. Moscow center for the education quality assessment. (2019). PISA-2018.
21. Retrieved from https://mcko.ru/pages/i_s_q_e_pisa. (In Russian)
22. Metropolis Schools. (2019). Raiting of moscow schools. Retrieved from https://
23. school.moscow/rating. (In Russian)
24. ОECD. (2014). http://www.erasmusplus.sk/uploads/publikacie/170EN.pdf.doi:10.2797/7857
25. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development Staff. (2006). Education at a Glance OECD Indicators — 2006 Edition. Paris: OECD.
26. Rothstein, R. (2004). Class and schools: Using social, economic, and educational reform to close the black-white achievement gap. Washington, D.C.: Economic Policy Institute
27. Schleicher A., Tamassia C. (2000). Measuring Student Knowledge and Skills:
28. The PISA 2000 Assessment of Reading, Mathematical and Scientific
29. Literacy. Education and Skills. OECD.
30. The portal of legal information. (2014). Order № 1726-р. Retrieved from http://
31. www.pravo.gov.ru. (In Russian)
Review
For citations:
CHERNOBAY E.V. Experience of the Department of Education andScience of the city of Moscow. How to replace schools’ struggle for resources with a competition for learning outcomes. Educational Policy. 2020;(1 (81)):42-51.
JATS XML






