EDUCATION OF THE FUTURE Federal State Education Standard 4.0 (FSES 4.0) is the first digital standard

The article initiates a discussion of FSES 4.0 as the first digital “standard” that sets its value-semantic foundations. It allows to evolve from the current processes of “preparation” and “training” to the prevalence of the process of “productive learning” (metacompetencies, self-organization, self-determination, goal-setting, productive action and reflection) and process of “upbringing” (ascending to culture, technologies for working with it).
FSES 4.0 is considered as setting a new type of norms — preadaptation norms, dynamic norms, norms in the moment. This helps to transform the school into supporting nodes of educational ecosystems with the functions of personal educational logistics, providing conditions for the development of personal education. The discussion of digital FSES 4.0 is conducted at the levels of values and meanings, methodology, technologies and tools based on the author’s model of digital transformation of education. The digital educational environment based by the authors as a set of actors, conditions and tools for designing and implementation of educational activities based on the unique capabilities of digital technologies — an environment that is designed by the person himself to master the content of education using digital technologies, where no other is possible, except creating your own educational environment. In this context, the FSES 4.0 initiative is a dynamically updated system of attitudes and capabilities, respectively, the voiced concepts and theses are the beginning of formation of its ontology in terms of digital institutions

1. Аbankina, I. V. (2020). The Personification Principle of new funding model for

2. FSES. Education Policy, 2(82), 15–16. (In Russian).

3. Abdul-Jabbar, M., & Kurshan, B. (2015). Educational Ecosystems: A Trend in

4. Urban Educational Innovation. Urban Education Journal, 12(1).

5. Аsmolov, A. G. (1985). Principles of human remembering organization. Мoscow:

6. Lomonosov Moscow State University. (In Russian).

7. Аsmolov, A. G. (2020). The guide to the school of opportunities. Education

8. Policy, 2(82), 8. (In Russian).

9. Аsmolov, G. A., & Аsmolov, A. G. (2019). The internet as a generative space:

10. Historical-evolutional perspective. Psychology Issues [Voprosy Psihologii],

11. , 3–28. (In Russian).

12. Аsmolov, A. G., Shekhter, Е. D., & Chernorizov, А. М. (2020). Complexity as

13. a symbol of human cognition: from the postulate to the research object.

14. Psychology Issues [Voprosy Psihologii], 1, 3–18. (In Russian).

15. Darling, M. et al. (2016). Emergent Learning: A Framework for Whole-System

16. Strategy, Learning, and Adaptation. The Foundation Review, 8(1). DOI: https://doi.org/10.9707/1944-5660.1284.

17. Dweck, C. (2006). Mindset: The New psychology of success.

18. EDSYS. (2019, February 7). Top 24 Educational Trends For 2020 Edsys

19. report. Edsys. Retrieved from https://www.edsys.in/educational-trends-for-2019.

20. Ekhtiari, Н. (2018, September 25). What Does the Education Ecosystem of 2030

21. Look Like? Retrieved from https://medium.com/audacious-futures/whatdoes-the-education-ecosystem-of-2030-look-like-89fff249b832.

22. Hall, R., & Schleicher, A. (2017). Framework for Change Leaders.

23. Kushnir, М. E., & Rabinovitch, P. D et al. (2019). The education

24. logistic in digital school. Education and Informatics, 9, 5–11.

25. DOI: 10.32517/0234-0453-2019-34-9-5-11. (In Russian).

26. Luksha, P. O., & Cubista, D. et al. (2017). Education for complicated society.

27. Мoscow. (In Russian).

28. Мorin, E. (2013). Education in the future: seven urgent tasks. Synergetics.

29. Мoscow, Saint Petersburg: Zgi-book. (In Russian).

30. Rabinovitch, P. D. (2020, April 15). Inintiative FSES. Education news [Vesti

31. obrazovaniya]. Retrieved from https://vogazeta.ru/articles/2020/4/15/

32. fgos/12568-initsiativa_fgos_40_v_dzhaze_tolko_otvazhnye. (In Russian).

33. Rabinovitch, P. D., & Zavedenskiy et al. (2020). Digital transformation of education: From changing funds to developing activities. Education and Informatics, 5, 4–14. DOI: 10.32517/0234-0453-2020-35-5-4-14. (In Russian).

34. Shchedrovitsky, P. G. (2010–2011). PUZZLES: How does a modern Manager

35. form a picture of the world. A series of lectures at National University of

36. Science and Technology. (In Russian).

37. Stark, D. (2009). Heterarchy: The organization of dissonance. Journal of

38. Economic Sociology, 10(1), 57–89. (In Russian).

39. King, K., Prince, K., & Swanson, J. (2016, June 28). Learning on the

40. Block: Could Smart Transactional Models Help Power Personalized

41. Learning? Retrieved from https://knowledgeworks.org/resources/blockchain-smart-transactional-models-2/.

42. McCarthy, J., & Minsky, M. et al. (1955). A Proposal for the Dartmouth Summer

43. Research Project on Artificial Intelligence. Al Magazine, 27.

44. McCulloch, W. S. (1945). A Heterarchy of Values Determined by the Topology

45. of Nervous Nets. Bulletin of Mathematical Biophysics, 7, 89–93.

46. Miller, R. (2006). From trends to futures literacy.

47. Mueller, S., & Toutain, O. (2015). The outward looking school and its ecosystem. OECD Economical Studies.

48. Prince, С. (2014). Innovating Toward a Vibrant Learning Ecosystem. KnowlegdeWorks Forecast 3.0.

49. Scharmer, C. (2018). Education is the kindling of a flame: How to reinvent the 21st-century university.

50. Spencer-Keyse, A., & Warren F. (2018). Every Child to Flourish: Understanding

51. Global Perspectives on Improving Education. Insights from a state of the debate review & global youth survey.

52. UNDP. (2019). United Nations Human Developments Reports. Human development reports. Retrieved from http://hdr.undp.org/en/data-visualization-challenge-2019.

53. Winthrop, R., & Barton, A. (2018). Can We Leapfrog? The Potential of Education

54. Innovations to Rapidly Accelerate Progress Center for Universal Education

55. at Brookings