Preview

Educational Policy

Advanced search

The Dynamics of Personal Agency among Participants in Social-psychological Training for Restoring Legal Capacity: Analysis of Interviews

Abstract

Protecting the rights and interests of individuals with mental disorders is crucial to their well-being and quality of life. However, their personal agency and self-determination remain under-researched. Exploring the phenomenon of «agency development» within the context of legal capacity restoration can significantly contribute to the existing body of knowledge. To this end, we conducted research analyzing interviews with individuals with mental disabilities who had participated in social-psychological training to prepare for legal capacity restoration and subsequently underwent court proceedings. This study included 15 participants, aged 24 to 69, diagnosed with schizophrenia spectrum disorders and intellectual disabilities. These individuals resided in various settings, including psychoneurological residential facilities, assisted living programs, and homes with relatives. All participants completed a social-psychological training program in 2023, and their subsequent legal proceedings have concluded. In-depth interviews were conducted to qualitatively assess the training’s effectiveness. The resulting data enabled us to identify and describe the dynamics of the participants’ personal agency development. Prior to the training and legal proceedings, participants exhibited a spectrum of personal agency, ranging from active self-direction to complete reliance on others’ decisions. The support provided by mentors proved instrumental in unlocking their potential. Frustrating experiences served as a catalyst, strengthening their determination to regain legal capacity and actively engage in the training. The outcomes of the court proceedings significantly impacted their sense of agency; favorable decisions fostered a sense of self-efficacy and the ability to act as agents of their own lives, while unfavorable decisions spurred participants to defend their rights. Participants who successfully restored their legal capacity displayed heightened reflection, self-regulation, self-awareness, self-confidence, and a desire for continued growth. Several participants attributed these positive changes to the support they received and their participation in the training program. In contrast, participants who experienced court refusals exhibited a distorted sense of reflection. Ultimately, self-determination and the capacity to effect positive change in their lives were most evident following the restoration of legal capacity.

About the Author

M. E. Sisneva
ANO SPE EMC “Osoboe detstvo”
Russian Federation

Maria E. Sisneva, Expert, Regional non-profit social organization “Center for Curative Pedagogics “Special Childhood” ANO SPE EMC “Osoboe detstvo”; clinical psychologist      

12/16, Bolshoy Savvinsky Ln., Moscow, 119435      



References

1. Bandura, A. (2001). Social Cognitive Theory: An Agentic Perspective. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.1

2. Barker, C. (2005). Cultural Studies: Theory and Practice. Sage.

3. Bronfenbrenner, U. (2009). The Ecology of Human Development: Experiments by Nature and Design. Harvard University Press.

4. Francis, C. J., Hazelton, M., & Wilson, R. L.(2024). Supported Decision&Making Interventions in Mental Healthcare: A Systematic Review of Evidence on the Outcomes for People with Mental Ill Health. Health Expect, 27(6). https://doi.org/10.1111/hex.70134

5. Howieson, J. A. (2023). Framework for the Evidence-based Practice of Therapeutic Jurisprudence: A Legal Therapeutic Alliance. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijlp.2023.101906

6. Mahomed, F., Stein, M. L., Sunkel, C. et al. (2022). Mental Health, Human Rights, and Legal Capacity. The Lancet Psychiatry, 9(5), 341–342. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2215–0366(21)00463–6

7. Melillo, A., Sansone, N., Allan, J. et al. (2025). Recovery-oriented and Traumainformed Care for People with Mental Disorders to Promote Human Rights and Quality of Mental Health Care: a Scoping Review. BMC Psychiatry, 25. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888–025–06473–4

8. Powers, W. T. (1998). Making Sense of Behavior: The Meaning of Control. Benchmark Publications Inc.

9. Rowe, M. (2015). Citizenship and Mental Health. Oxford University Press.

10. Ryan, M. R., & Deci, E. L. (2017). Self-Determination Theory: Basic Psychological Needs in Motivation, Development, and Wellness. The Guilford Press.

11. Vallacher, R. R., & Wegner, D. M. (1989). Levels of Personal Agency: Individual Variation in Action Identification. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57(4), 660–671.


Review

For citations:


Sisneva M.E. The Dynamics of Personal Agency among Participants in Social-psychological Training for Restoring Legal Capacity: Analysis of Interviews. Educational Policy. 2025;22(3):20–27. (In Russ.)

Views: 102

JATS XML


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2078-838X (Print)
ISSN 2949-0987 (Online)