PEDAGOGICAL STRATEGIES of active learning: theory and practice

This article is devoted to effective teaching strategies and their implementation in the classroom During the first 20 years of the new millennium, researchers in the educational community have established a consensus on the characteristics of modem education both in terms of its results and on the organization of the educational process (Wyse et a l 2015} However a new agenda of the "student-centered’ educational process did not end with the setting of new educational goals The problem is not only in adopting new guidelines and shifting the traditional focus in teaching Such a transformation is possible only if a teacher implements certain pedagogical strategies This article describes strategies whose effectiveness is based on large international studies (Hatty, 2018, OECD, 2018) Those strategies are the following: setting goals, structuring lessons, open (explicit) teaching, worked examples, collaborative learning, questioning, feedback, metacognitive strategies, differentiated teaming, multiple exposures The mam question that arises in connection with the presented models is, of course, the question of their relevance to the practice of Russian schools, i e in terms of implementation of a particular pedagogical strategy m real teaching practice Is it possible for a teacher of a particular discipline to regularly apply any of those strategies working withm the framework of the Federal State Educational Standard and the educational program of the schooPThe article presents examples of how each of the 10 strategies is implemented in different subject-specific lessons and for different stages of learning All examples illustrate the teaching practice of in-service teachers of three Moscow schools.
This article is a collective work of researchers and in-service teachers, which is considered by the authors as one of the options fora professional communication and cooperation.

1. Гусинский Э. Н.» Турчанинова Ю. И. (2003) Введение в философию об­разования. М.: Л о "ос, 248 с. 2. Марголис А. А. (2015). Модели подготовки педагогов в рамках про­ грамм прикладного бакалавриата и педагогической магистратуры.

2. Психологическая наука и образование, 20(5), 45-64.

3. Пинская М. А., Михайлова А. М., Рыдзе 0. А., Денищева Л 0., Краснян­ская К. А., Авдеенко Н. А. (2019а). Навыки XXI века: как формировать и оценивать на уроке? Образовательная политика, 3 (79), 50-62.

4. Пинская М. А., Бысик Н. В., Милкус А. Б., Косарецкий С. Г. (2019). По­ верх барьеров: истории школ, работающих в сложных социальных ус­ловиях. М.: Издательский дом НИУ ВШЭ. 192 с.

5. Универсальные компетентности и новая грамотность: от лозунгов к реальности (под ред. М С. Добрякозой, И. Д Фрумина). (2020). Изд дом Высшей школы экономики, 472 с.

6. Ушинский К Д. (1867). Человек как предмет воспитания: опыт педа­гогической антропологии. с helovekl html (дата обращения: 20.05.2022). http://djgward.ru/library/pecagog/ush‘nskiy_

7. Хэтти Дж. (2017). Видимое обучение: синтез более 800 метаанализов, посвященных достижениям школьников. М: Национальное образова­ние, 432 с.

8. Шляйхер А. (2019). Образование мирового уровня. Как выстроить школьную систему XXI зека? Национальное образование, 336 с.

9. OECD (2019). Future of Education and Skills 2030. Conceptua learning framework. Leading Compass 2030. https://www.oecd org/ education/2030-proiect/teachirg-and-lea, nirg/learnirg/iearnirg- coripass-2030/OECD_Learning_Compass_2030_concept_note pcf (дата обращения 20 05 2022).

10. Paniagua A., Istarce D. (2018). Teachers as Des gners of Learning Environments: The Impo’tance of Innovative Pecagoges. Educational Research and Irnovat on, OECD Publishing, Par’s, 210 p https://doi.o-g/10.1787/9789264085374-en.

11. Petersor A., Dumont H., Lafuente M„ Law N. (2018). UncerstanCing innovative pedagogies key themes to ana yse new approaches to teaching

12. and earning. OECD Ecucation Working Papers, 172, Directorate for educat or and skil s https://www.oecc.org'officialdocjments/pjblicd spla ydocumentpcf/?cote=EDU/WKP(2018)8&cocLanguage=En (дата обраще­ния: 20.05.2022).

13. Schleicher A., Ramos G. (2016). Giooal competency for an inclusive world.

14. OECD. oecd.org/pisa/aooutpisa/Global-competency-fo'-an- inclusive-world.pdf. https://www

15. The Education State. State of Victoria. (2020). H gh impact teach ng strategies. Excellence in Teaching and Learning on. vic.gov.au/Documents/schooi/teache's/sjpport/high-impact-teaching- strategies.pdf (дата обращения: 20.05.2022).

16. https://www.educat

17. Ulferts H. (2020). The Re evance of Genera! Pedagogical Knowlecge For Successful Teaching: Systemat c review and meta-analysis of the internet ona evidence f'om primary to tertiary education. OECD Ecucat’on Working Pape'S, 212. http$://www.oecd-irbra, pcPexp’res=1613551791&id=ic&accname=guest&checksum=4FAD822B E3470D757446A8B5189В646В/.y.org/cocserver/ede8feb6-en

18. World Economic Fo'um. (2016). New Vision for Ecucation: Fostering Soc al and Emot ora Learning th'ojgh Technology, Cocs/WEF_New_Vision_for_Education.pdf (дата обращения: 15.02.2021). http://www3.weforum.org/

19. Wyse D., Hayward L., Pandya J. (2015). The SAGE Handoook of Curr’cu urn, Pedagogy and Assessment. SAGE, 1104 p.