A Self-Learning Team — is the Most Important Result of a Leader’s Work
Abstract
Modern heads of educational institutions often experience anxiety regarding the school’s performance during their absence. Analyzing this phenomenon, the authors turn to the practice of military training, demonstrating the importance of an organization’s ability to function autonomously even in the temporary absence of the commander. The success of a unit commander is assessed precisely when the commander is temporarily «removed» from the management process, and the team must demonstrate the ability to quickly adapt and make independent decisions in a situation of uncertainty. This rule is also applicable to educational institutions, emphasizing the need to foster a corporate culture of rapid learning, self-learning, and adaptation to change. The authors propose two approaches to management: the first focuses on developing the abilities of the entire team, the second emphasizes the personal indispensability of the leader. Only the first path ensures the sustainable development of the school, making it competitive and flexible in the face of constant change.
About the Authors
I. I. KalinaRussian Federation
Isaak I. Kalina - PhD in Pedagogy, Honored Teacher of the Russian Federation, Honorary Member of the Russian Academy of Education, Advisor to the Rectorate
10A/2, Radio Str., Moscow, 105005
M. I. Koverova
Russian Federation
Mariya I. Koverova - PhD in Pedagogy, Deputy Head of the Continuing Professional Education Development Department
10A/2, Radio Str., Moscow, 105005
References
1. Калина, И. И., Положевец, П. Г., Казакова, Е. И., Калимуллин, А. М., &
2. Реморенко, И. М. (2022). Вызовы и перспективы личностноразвивающего образования. Образовательная политика, 2(90), 12–27. EDN: HHXOTU
3. Колесникова, И. А., & Горчакова-Сибирская, М. П. (2005). В В. А. Сластенин, И. А. Колесникова (Ред.), Педагогическое проектирование. Академия.
4. Лазарев, В. С., Афанасьева, Т. П., & Елисеева, И. А. (2015). Инновационная деятельность в школах развивающего обучения. Авторский клуб.
5. Семенов, И. Н., & Болдина, Т. Г. (Ред.). (2011). Проектноисследовательский подход в рефлексивной психологии инновационного образования. Аналитика РОДИС.
6. Сенге, П. (2009). Пятая дисциплина. Искусство и практика обучающейся организации. Олимп-Бизнес.
7. Сластенин, В. А. (Ред.). (1991). Теория и практика высшего педагогического образования. Прометей.
8. Талеб, Н. Н. (2023). Антихрупкость. Как извлечь выгоду из хаоса. КоЛибри, Азбука-Аттикус.
9. Шамова, Т. И., Давыденко, Т. М., & Шибанова, Г. Н. (2005). В Т. И. Шамова (Ред.). Управление образовательными системами. Академия. Amabile, T., & Kramer, S. (2011). The Progress Principle. Harvard Business Review. Press.
10. Greenleaf, R. K. (1977). Servant Leadership: A Journey into the Nature of Legitimate Power and Greatness. Paulist Press.
11. Hackman, J. R. (Ed.). (1990). Groups that work (and those that don’t): Creating conditions for effective teamwork. Jossey-Bass Inc., Publishers.
12. Seligman, M. E. P. (1972). Learned Helplessness. Annual Review of Medicine, 23, 407–412. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.me.23.020172.002203
13. Wageman, R., Nunes, D. A., Burruss, J. A., & Hackman, J. R. (2008). Senior leadership teams: What it takes to make them great. Harvard Business School Press.
Review
For citations:
Kalina I.I., Koverova M.I. A Self-Learning Team — is the Most Important Result of a Leader’s Work. Educational Policy. 2025;21(2):74-79. (In Russ.)
JATS XML






